Board Thread:Wikia Updates/@comment-31232700-20160522181646/@comment-31232700-20160524001617

Aptos wrote:

Raelcontor wrote:

Aptos wrote:

Raelcontor wrote:

Aptos wrote: Hey, as a sorta half-compromise for CC versus pages, could there be a page for approved characters with only CC's, and a page for under review characters with only CC's? This way we can have a permanent page in under review with substance inside. It'd be a bit cumbersome for the chracter mods to review a giant, lomg page of unreviewed gems. As opposed to several pages of an equally long length? Then comments and everything would work the same to move them along, and then the users would then move their own approved CC's over. It would have convenience as to find some ccs that need reviewing, plus, this way people don't have to make entire oages for characters if a CC would do. The Character Mods would prefer individual pages. It's much easier to review "[Gem] has an unstable personality, their fear driving their power forward" than

Personality: She is powered by fear.

It allows for good reference for RPs as well. Or, God forbid...

...Don't make gems specifically for only one RP in the first place? Oh yes. That would be crazy, doing that.......but why would this be so necessary? This prevents individuals who might want to create gemsonas for just one rp. Either way, would this CC concept not work for the idea of a minor gem page? Besides, i keep comprehensive CC's. Character Cards are hardly descriptive most of the time. If you wish to make a CC comp. page for your OWN Gems, I don't see why you shouldn't be able to. Please realize that it won't make our jobs any easier, though.